Procurement-fraud signals, evidence-grade.
A B2B analytics workspace for whistleblower law firms. Ingests USAspending, FPDS, and SAM.gov data. Surfaces statistical anomalies across awards, vendors, and pricing. Output is investigative analytics, not legal advice.
Sold exclusively to qui-tam law firms. We do not file as relator. We do not provide legal advice. Outside counsel review precedes any new firm onboarding.
What you get
Federal awards corpus
USAspending and FPDS data ingested and refreshed continuously. NAICS, vendor, agency, period-of-performance, value, and contract type all queryable.
Pattern detection
Statistical models surface signals: bid-rigging clusters, ghost-vendor patterns, LPTA gaming, sole-source abuse, set-aside front-company indicators.
Case workspaces
Per-investigation workspace. Timeline, target awards, evidence narrative, and a structured disclosure-packet template aligned to standard DOJ format.
Signal scoring
Each pattern hit gets a confidence score and a transparent explanation of which features triggered it. Models are auditable, not black-box.
Per-firm tenancy
Each firm's investigations are isolated by Row-Level Security. Your case theory does not leak to other firms on the platform.
Audit-defensible outputs
Every analyst action (search, signal review, case edit) is captured in a tamper-evident hash chain. Useful when discovery comes around.
How the engagement runs
Firm onboarding
Diligence on the firm's qui-tam practice. Engagement letter signed. Per-firm tenant provisioned with isolated workspace and seat-based licensing.
Analyst training
Half-day session with your investigators on data sources, signal types, and case-workspace use. Recorded for new-hire onboarding.
Investigation cycle
Analysts query the awards corpus, surface signals, and build case workspaces. Output is a draft disclosure-packet structure your attorneys finalize and file.
Refresh and iterate
Federal data refreshes continuously. Models improve as your firm flags true and false positives.
In scope vs. out of scope
In scope
- Pattern detection across federal procurement awards (USAspending, FPDS)
- Per-firm investigation workspaces with audit-defensible outputs
- Disclosure-packet template generation aligned to DOJ format
- Signal-scoring transparency (no black-box models)
Out of scope
- ×Legal advice (we are not a law firm; final judgment is your attorneys')
- ×Filing as relator on behalf of clients (we do not act as relator)
- ×State or healthcare FCA matters outside federal procurement (federal procurement only)
- ×Direct outreach to whistleblowers (this is a tool for firms, not a marketing channel for relators)
All marketing and product copy is investigative analytics. Legal interpretation, filing decisions, and client communications remain with the firm's licensed attorneys.
FAQ
What data sources do you analyze?
SAM.gov, USAspending.gov, agency-specific contract databases, and historical performance data. We aggregate public records to identify pipeline and competitor trends.
How far back does your historical data go?
We analyze contract awards back to 2010 for most federal agencies. Some specialized databases extend further. We'll specify timeframes during your intake.
Can you identify pipeline opportunities?
Yes. Our pipeline analytics flag upcoming solicitations, amendments, and recompete notices. We track agency spending patterns and forecast future demand.
Do you compare me to my competitors?
Yes. We profile your key competitors: win rates, average contract values, and typical contract types. We identify gaps where you can grow.
How is this different from a market-research report?
We integrate data into ongoing strategy, not just deliver a static report. Quarterly updates, real-time pipeline alerts, and personalized growth recommendations are part of the service.
Want to talk through a specific opportunity?
Bring the solicitation. We'll tell you whether it's a fit and what the engagement would look like.